<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Committee Passes Landmark Clean Energy Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://texasvox.org/2009/05/22/house-committee-passes-landmark-clean-energy-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://texasvox.org/2009/05/22/house-committee-passes-landmark-clean-energy-legislation/</link>
	<description>The Voice of Public Citizen in Texas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Year in Review: The Little Climate Bill That Couldn&#8217;t &#171; TexasVox: The Voice of Public Citizen in Texas</title>
		<link>http://texasvox.org/2009/05/22/house-committee-passes-landmark-clean-energy-legislation/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Year in Review: The Little Climate Bill That Couldn&#8217;t &#171; TexasVox: The Voice of Public Citizen in Texas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texasvox.org/?p=3464#comment-1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] If only that had been the extent of the funny business with the bill&#8230; but both behind closed doors and by amendment in the committee, the climate bill got gutted.  First, special giveaways to the nuclear industry. Then to the coal industry. Then decreasing the renewables and efficiency goals by almost half.  Then offsets language that guaranteed that polluters would be able to continue to pollute above the cap&#8211; meaning in a bill whose primary purpose is to make sure we curb pollution so we don&#8217;t fry the planet, our emissions might actually GO UP, not down. And the bill passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee, its largest hurdle, but by then it had been incredibly compromised.  Our immediate reaction was:  follow the money (ad this remains the single best explanation of what... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If only that had been the extent of the funny business with the bill&#8230; but both behind closed doors and by amendment in the committee, the climate bill got gutted.  First, special giveaways to the nuclear industry. Then to the coal industry. Then decreasing the renewables and efficiency goals by almost half.  Then offsets language that guaranteed that polluters would be able to continue to pollute above the cap&#8211; meaning in a bill whose primary purpose is to make sure we curb pollution so we don&#8217;t fry the planet, our emissions might actually GO UP, not down. And the bill passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee, its largest hurdle, but by then it had been incredibly compromised.  Our immediate reaction was:  follow the money (ad this remains the single best explanation of what&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes your leaders listen: Lloyd Doggett and the Safe Markets Development Act &#171; TexasVox: The Voice of Public Citizen in Texas</title>
		<link>http://texasvox.org/2009/05/22/house-committee-passes-landmark-clean-energy-legislation/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sometimes your leaders listen: Lloyd Doggett and the Safe Markets Development Act &#171; TexasVox: The Voice of Public Citizen in Texas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texasvox.org/?p=3464#comment-760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 28, 2009 by Andy Wilson    We&#8217;ve been disappointed by the process that the American Clean Energy and Security Act has gone through, recently, and a few weeks ago I went to go see my Congressman during his [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 28, 2009 by Andy Wilson    We&#8217;ve been disappointed by the process that the American Clean Energy and Security Act has gone through, recently, and a few weeks ago I went to go see my Congressman during his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

