Archive for the ‘Renewables’ Category
Netroots Memories: Clean Energy Girl vs. Dirty Coal Monster
Posted in Renewables, tagged Clean Energy, Dirty Coal, Netroots, Texas on August 7, 2008 |
MIT Solar Storage Breakthrough– turn your house into a Power Plant
Posted in Energy, Renewables, tagged Daniel Nocera, energy storage, fuel cells, MIT, solar, Texas on August 1, 2008 |
Researchers at MIT have developed a fuel cell which could revolutionize not only how we get energy but how we think about it. The old model has always been to hook up your home to a power grid and an electric utility which buys electricity from coal and gas-burning power plants (and to a lesser degree nuclear and in the last few years some wind).
[blip.tv ?posts_id=1297&dest=-1]
With this breakthrough, we can conceivably turn our homes into “power plants… and gas stations” according to MIT’s Daniel Nocera.
With Daniel Nocera’s and Matthew Kanan’s new catalyst, homeowners could use their solar panels during the day to power their home, while also using the energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen for storage. At night, the stored hydrogen and oxygen could be recombined using a fuel cell to generate power while the solar panels are inactive.
This is an important breakthrough that will lead to lower energy prices for us, but we have to act quickly. We need to deploy smart meters in our cities and start getting ready for plug-in hybrids or fully electric vehicles. Bring it up with your Congressman, Senator, State Legislator, City Councilmember, or electric Co-op board member and get ready for the next generation in energy.
A very alternative energy source
Posted in Energy, Global Warming, Renewables, tagged alternative energy, alternative energy source, alternative energy sources, New York Times, O. Glenn Smith, renewable energy, solar, solar panels, space-based solar, Texas on July 24, 2008 |
An op-ed in the New York Times yesterday by O. Glenn Smith, a former NASA employee, suggests what is certainly a “thinking outside the box” kind of solution to our nation’s energy woes: solar panels…in outer space.
Smith recommends building large solar panels that would orbit the earth and send energy back to us via wireless radio waves. Apparently, the technology already exists, and the pro column reads something like this:
- not hampered by weather
- works 24 hours a day (the sun never sets in space)
- environmentally friendly
- cost-competitive with other renewables
- makes use of the United States’ hefty investment in space travel
While I’m always glad to hear about innovations that will help our globe move toward a sustainable energy schema, I’m a little skeptical about the way Smith holds up this technology as the way of the immediate future. He opens his piece with this:
As we face $4.50 a gallon gas, we also know that alternative energy sources — coal, oil shale, ethanol, wind and ground-based solar — are either of limited potential, very expensive, require huge energy storage systems or harm the environment.
This quick dismissal of the alternative energy sources we know and love (except…how is coal alternative?) is questionable. For starters, I have a hard time believing that any energy system that must be installed and maintained outside our atmosphere will be less expensive than one based here on the earth’s surface.
Smith also ignores the benefits that energy sources like wind and ground-based solar provide that space-based solar does not. One of the great benefits of investing in wind and solar power is the creation of thousands of jobs, especially in rural areas. The fact that the handymen for these solar panels in space would have to also be astronauts prevents space-based solar from becoming a solution to the dearth of quality manufacturing and other blue-collar jobs in this country.
Some day, I hope we will see space-to-earth solar energy. But for now, let’s focus on all the untapped renewable energy potential here on terra firma before we pull a Buy N’ Large* and run to outer space in search of the answers.
But if the idea of space-based solar intrigues you, you can read more about it on this blog dedicated to the topic.
*obligitory (in my opinion anyway) Wall-E reference
-Natalie Messer
Will the Pedernales Board get the message?
Posted in Energy, Renewables, tagged Clean Water Action, Efficiency, PEC4U, Pedernales, Renewables, Texas on July 22, 2008 |
While the Statesman covered the hubbub around the PEC Board’s agreement to cut their salary more than 40%, that wasn’t the only news from the first meeting of the new Board yesterday.
Ric Sternberg of PEC4U, et al, delivered over 4000 letters and postcards to the new Board from Pedernales members demanding more conservation, efficiency, and renewable energy.
Sternberg, Smitty, and David Foster from Clean Water Action held a press conference beforehand.
[youtube=http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=6F5Uo1OAk50]
Want some Kidney Stones to go with your Global Warming?
Posted in Global Warming, Renewables, tagged Coal, Global Warming, health effects, Renewables, Texas on July 18, 2008 |
A new study from Tom Brikowski, a geosciences professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, and Drs. Yair Lotan and Margaret Pearle, urology professors at UT Southwestern Medical School, printed in this week’s issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, made an interesting conclusion. More global warming will mean more kidney stones. For those of us who are at risk for or have a family history of kidney stones (it’s because of all the Diet Coke I drink), this is even more worrisome.
The good news is we can easily change our diets and reduce other risk factors. Switching to non-carbon producing forms of energy and transportation may not be quite so easy. However, just like kicking a bad Diet Coke habit. we can get ourselves off of oil and especially coal by making new investments in renewable energy.
Kidney stones are just the beginning of the health problems we can prevent by stopping global warming. We can prevent the spread of previously tropical and exotic disease like malaria and West Nile virus that can migrate as the climate changes. By stopping greenhouse gas pollution we can also stop the pollution that leads to asthma, emphysema, and other lung ailments. And by investing in efficiency and renewable energy now, we can have cheaper energy and get more bang for our energy buck.
Read the story in the Dallas Morning News on this subject here.
~~Andy
Austin church installs solar panels
Posted in Energy, Renewables, tagged church, distributed generation, Renewables, San Francisco de Asis, solar, solar panel installation, solar panels, Texas on July 18, 2008 |
An intern brigade (Adrien, Melissa, and I) traveled out to South Austin earlier this month to show Public Citizen support at the San Francisco de Asis Episcopal Church’s ribbon cutting ceremony for their solar panel installation. On top of the good work of this church’s affiliated mission, El Buen Samaritano, which provides health care and education for the church community, San Francisco de Asis is now doing good for the wider community as a producer of clean energy. And Reverend Jose Palma says the solar panels will save the church $10,000 a year (!!) in electric bills.
The church has also made this installation their own—the solar panels on the roof form the shape of a cross.
Laura from Austin Energy told us that the City of Austin’s funding of solar rebates is what makes these kind of installations possible. Although Austin Energy and CPS Energy in San Antonio offer good rebate programs and all Texas residents are eligible for a small federal rebate, the state of Texas has yet to establish a comprehensive rebate program so that all Texans can take advantage of the abundant sun here.
The More You Know:
CBS News recently aired this report on the future of solar energy:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-fhs1ceke0&NR=1]
If you are interested in installing your own solar panels you can check out the websites for the Texas Solar Power Company (who installed San Francisco de Asis’ panels) or Mehr Solar’s Texas page.
Related links:
– Natalie Messer
You so CRE-Z
Posted in Energy, Renewables, tagged CREZ, PUC, Renewables, solar, Texas, wind on July 18, 2008 |
So the Public Utility Commission of Texas announced today that they will go with Scenario 2 on CREZ (Competitive Renewable Energy Zone).
This explains what’s going on pretty well.
[googlevideo=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7905263642828210852&hl=en]
CPS Energy looks kind of ridiculous in it. They originally endorsed Scenario 1b (the least amount of transmission to be considered), but last week the Express-News reported on their change of tune.
Cleaner cheaper energy for Texas? Coming soon! (We Won!!)
Posted in Energy, Global Warming, Renewables, tagged Global Warming, PUC, Renewables, solar, Texas, wind on July 17, 2008 |
This article originally posted at citizenvox.org
Global warming is the singular environmental challenge of our generation. Some people claim you cannot be green without sacrificing economic development. Actually, we can create a greener energy future for Texas and reduce our electric bills at the same time by investing in our electric infrastructure.
This week the Texas Public Utility Commission met to decide on upgrading the power grid infrastructure to make sure that we can build new clean, renewable sources of energy in West Texas (where all the sun and wind is) and get it to the people in the major population centers in East Texas. Of three options, they chose the medium, compromise amount of investment. While not as large as we would have liked (the best option was an “electric superhighway” that would have saved Texans billions in their energy bills), the PUC chose to make a large investment in the clean energy future of our state.
Wind power in Texas is now a cheaper source of electricity than fossil fuel alternatives. Building newer transmission lines is the best way to quit our addiction to fossil fuels.
Want to learn more? Read our press release about our news conference, or read the study and policy paper here. You can also watch a video about renewable energy in Texas and how we can save $1.2 billion dollars here.